[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FF68978.80703@nvidia.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2012 12:15:12 +0530
From: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
CC: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
"grant.likely@...retlab.ca" <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
"rob.herring@...xeda.com" <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
"lrg@...com" <lrg@...com>, Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>,
"sameo@...ux.intel.com" <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org"
<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: tps65910: add support for input supply
On Friday 06 July 2012 12:47 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 07/05/2012 01:11 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 01:09:30PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>> On 07/05/2012 08:03 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>>>> +- vin-xxx-supply: Input voltage supply regulator.
>>> It'd be nice to name these simply xxx-supply; the "vin-" seems
>>> redundant.
>> I suspect the pin is named vin_supply (ie, vin subscript supply) in
>> the datasheet so this is idiomatic.
> That's certainly true on some of the PMICs we use, but not this one
> according to the datasheet I looked at.
As per datasheet of tps65910 and tps65911, the prefix "vin" is not
there. I took from the other patch discussion.
I will remove it and then send new patch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists