[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120706072752.GD17681@parisc-linux.org>
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2012 01:27:52 -0600
From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
To: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/4] block: implement runtime pm strategy
On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 12:04:31PM +0800, Lin Ming wrote:
> When a request is added:
> If device is suspended or is suspending and the request is not a
> PM request, resume the device.
>
> When a request finishes:
> Call pm_runtime_mark_last_busy().
>
> When pick a request:
> If device is resuming/suspending, then only PM request is allowed to go.
> Return NULL for other cases.
This only works for drivers which are struct request based. For those
that handle struct bio directly, nr_pending will always be 0.
I think the right place to increment nr_pending is in generic_make_request.
But I'm not sure where to decrement it. I think we need a blk_bio_endio()
which does some housekeeping and then calls bio_endio().
--
Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists