[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FF63954.5040408@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2012 09:03:16 +0800
From: Asias He <asias@...hat.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
CC: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>, dlaor@...hat.com,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] virtio-blk: Add bio-based IO path for virtio-blk
On 07/04/2012 10:40 AM, Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Jul 2012 08:39:39 +0800, Asias He <asias@...hat.com> wrote:
>> On 07/02/2012 02:41 PM, Rusty Russell wrote:
>>> Sure, our guest merging might save us 100x as many exits as no merging.
>>> But since we're not doing many requests, does it matter?
>>
>> We can still have many requests with slow devices. The number of
>> requests depends on the workload in guest. E.g. 512 IO threads in guest
>> keeping doing IO.
>
> You can have many requests outstanding. But if the device is slow, the
> rate of requests being serviced must be low.
Yes.
> Am I misunderstanding something? I thought if you could have a high
> rate of requests, it's not a slow device.
Sure.
--
Asias
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists