[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201207060112.q661CaG4002389@ignucius.se.axis.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2012 03:12:36 +0200
From: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hans-peter.nilsson@...s.com>
To: geert@...ux-m68k.org
CC: jack@...e.cz, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-cris-kernel@...s.com
Subject: Re: size_t/ssize_t warnings (was: Re: Build regressions/improvements in
v3.5-rc5)
> From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
> Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 22:17:28 +0200
> On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> wrote:
> >> + fs/quota/quota_tree.c: warning: format '%zd' expects argument of type 'signed size_t', but argument 4 has type 'ssize_t' [-Wformat]: => 372:4
> >> + fs/quota/quota_v2.c: warning: format '%zd' expects argument of type 'signed size_t', but argument 5 has type 'ssize_t' [-Wformat]: => 66:92
> > These really look like false positives (there are quite a few of this
> > kind). Can we possibly silence them?
>
> These 2 warnings happen on cris only, because size_t is unsigned int and
> ssize_t is (signed) long.
Um, no, ssize_t isn't long. Do you mean __kernel_ssize_t?
(Or are you looking at cris-axis-elf? ...no, that can't be it,
as you see __SIZE_TYPE__ being unsigned int.)
> They go away if I make ssize_t int.
But ssize_t already is int...
N.B. size_t is different between cris-axis-elf and
cris-axis-linux-gnu. The former uses the default definition in
gcc/defaults.h (long unsigned int) and the latter sets it
specifically to "unsigned int", in gcc/config/cris/linux.h (or
before 2010-12-09, from config/svr4.h). The ssize_t definition
comes from glibc, where it is "int".
> __kernel_size_t __kernel_ssize_t
> --------------- ----------------
> cris: __SIZE_TYPE__ (unsigned int) long
A bit odd; __kernel_ssize_t should probably change to int, to
match ssize_t.
> Cris-people: __SIZE_TYPE__ turned out to be hardcoded in my compiler (gcc
> 4.6.3 from Tony's collection) to unsigned int. Is that correct?
Correct, for cris-axis-linux-gnu.
> And why do some 32-bit architectures use unsigned long/long?
I'd guess from the gcc default.
brgds, H-P
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists