[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120706112926.42f2548cb2eebc74c547c847@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2012 11:29:26 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the signal tree with the
arm-current tree
Hi all,
On Thu, 5 Jul 2012 08:52:04 +0100 Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> Currently, bugs have been found with the signal handling updates which
> happened during the last merge window.
>
> Will has concerns with Al's proposed fixes for the signal handling.
> Unfortunately, Al isn't responding to attempts to discuss this (for
> whatever reason), and as we're now at -rc5, we believe Al's patches are
> now too complex to go into this stage of -rc.
>
> We have had to find a way forward on this - which means reverting some
> of the commits that went in during the previous merge window.
>
> So, your revert to "fix" this isn't a good idea, because it isn't what
> will be going to Linus this weekend.
OK, so for today, I have reverted these commits from Al's signal tree:
c1eafa6fc84a "arm: pull all work_pending logics into C function"
9c802c169f96 "arm: deal with handlerless restarts without leaving the kernel"
76c3f4da3ee4 "arm: get rid of TIF_SYSCALL_RESTARTSYS"
(I was not sure if I needed to revert the first of these.)
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists