linux-kernel - Re: regulator: Does it make sense to set the same ops for [en|dis]able and set_suspend

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120706110641.GA4017@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date:	Fri, 6 Jul 2012 12:06:41 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	Axel Lin <axel.lin@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
	Liam Girdwood <lrg@...com>,
	MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: regulator: Does it make sense to set the same ops for
 [en|dis]able and set_suspend_[en|dis]able?

On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 10:36:27AM +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
> Just wandering does it make sense to set the same ops for
> [en|dis]able and set_suspend_[en|dis]able callbacks.
> 
> Or these drivers need fix?

These drivers needo to be fixed, using the same ops for both is actively
broken.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)