[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1341583705.4655.18.camel@amber.site>
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2012 16:08:25 +0200
From: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Subject: [PATCH] CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR is no longer experimental
This feature has been around for over 5 years now, so I presume it is
no longer considered experimental.
Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
---
Or is there any reason to still consider this an experimental feature?
arch/x86/Kconfig | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- linux-3.5-rc5.orig/arch/x86/Kconfig 2012-06-05 16:22:58.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-3.5-rc5/arch/x86/Kconfig 2012-07-06 15:32:55.660276577 +0200
@@ -1525,7 +1525,7 @@ config SECCOMP
If unsure, say Y. Only embedded should say N here.
config CC_STACKPROTECTOR
- bool "Enable -fstack-protector buffer overflow detection (EXPERIMENTAL)"
+ bool "Enable -fstack-protector buffer overflow detection"
---help---
This option turns on the -fstack-protector GCC feature. This
feature puts, at the beginning of functions, a canary value on
--
Jean Delvare
Suse L3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists