linux-kernel - Re: Network namespace and bonding WARNING at fs/proc/generic.c remove_proc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 06 Jul 2012 14:01:20 -0400
From:	Dilip Daya <dilip.daya@...com>
To:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc:	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Network namespace and bonding WARNING at fs/proc/generic.c
 remove_proc_entry

Hi Eric,

On Thu, 2012-07-05 at 17:41 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com> writes:
> 
> > Quoting Dilip Daya (dilip.daya@...com):
> >> Hi,
> >> 
> >> I'd discussed the following with Serge Hallyn.
> >> 
> >> => Environment based on 3.2.18 / x86_64 kernel.
> >> => WARNING: at fs/proc/generic.c:808 remove_proc_entry+0xdb/0x21f()
> >> => WARNING: at fs/proc/generic.c:849 remove_proc_entry+0x208/0x21f()
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > thanks much for sending this.  I'm still getting this error on
> > 3.5.0-2-generic (today's ubuntu quantal kernel)
> >
> >> network namespace and bonding
> >> -----------------------------
> >> 
> >> * Migrate two phy nics from host to netns (netns0).
> >>   - ip link set ethX netns netns0
> >> 
> >> * In host environment:
> >>   - load bonding module, /sbin/modprobe -v bonding mode=1 miimon=100
> >>   - /sys/class/net/bond0 exists.
> >>   - /proc/net/bonding/bond0 exists.
> >>   - /sys/class/net/bonding_masters has bond0.
> >> 
> >> * Migrate bond0 to netns (netns0):
> >>   - ip link set bond0 netns netns0.
> >> 
> >> * Within netns (netns0):
> >>   - /sys/class/net/bonding_masters is empty.
> >>   - /sys/class/net/bond0 exist.
> >>   - configure bond0 and ifenslave with two phy nics.
> >>   - /proc/net/bonding/bond0 does not exist within netns0, but does
> >>     exist in the host environment.
> >>   - /sys/class/net/bonding_masters is empty.
> >
> > mine is not empty, fwiw.  However
> >
> >>   - ping to remote end of bond0 works.
> >> 
> >> * Within netns (netns0), flushing ethX and bondY:
> >>   - down bond0 and its phy nic interfaces:
> >>   - ip link set ... down
> >>   - ip addr flush dev [bond0 | eth#]
> >>   - deleting bond0, /sbin/ip link del dev bond0
> >
> > Yup I still get a remove_proc_entry WARNING at fs/proc/generic.c:808,
> > which is the warning when (!de)
> 
> It looks like Dilip is running an old kernel.  There should have been
> some version of /sys/class/net/bonding_masters in every network
> namespace since sometime in 2009.
> 
> >From the warning it looks like the proc files are being added/removed
> to the wrong network namespace.  So in one namespace we get an error
> when we delete the moved device and in the other network namespace
> we get an error when we remove the /proc/directory.
> 
> An old kernel without proper network namespace support is the only
> reason I can imagine someone would be moving an existing bond device
> between network namespaces.
> 
> If there are other reasons for wanting to move a bonding device between
> network namespaces it is possible to catch the NETDEV_UNREGISTER and
> NETDEV_REGISTER events to remove/add the per device proc files at the
> appropriate time.


We do need to move bonds between namespaces - because we require
physical interfaces in each namespace -- we don't want the overheads of
virtual interfaces, don't have the management infrastructure, and don't
want to manufacture fake mac addresses that would be required for
macvlan interfaces.   Since the bonds are implicitly created in the host
namespace, the only way we know to get bonds directly into the
namespaces is to move them.

Would "NETDEV_UNREGISTER and NETDEV_REGISTER events to remove/add the
per device proc files at the appropriate time." help in the case?


-DilipD.


> However since moving bonding devices appears to be an unneded operation
> let's just do things simply and forbid moving bonding devices between
> network namespaces.  Serge, Dilip can you two test the patch below
> and see if it fixes the warnings.
> 
> Eric
> 
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> index 2ee8cf9..818ed64 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> @@ -4345,6 +4345,9 @@ static void bond_setup(struct net_device *bond_dev)
>         bond_dev->priv_flags |= IFF_BONDING;
>         bond_dev->priv_flags &= ~(IFF_XMIT_DST_RELEASE | IFF_TX_SKB_SHARING);
>  
> +       /* Don't allow bond devices to change network namespaces. */
> +       bond_dev->features |= NETIF_F_LOCAL;
> +
>         /* At first, we block adding VLANs. That's the only way to
>          * prevent problems that occur when adding VLANs over an
>          * empty bond. The block will be removed once non-challenged

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/