[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1341597064.5347.3.camel@localhost>
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2012 13:51:04 -0400
From: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: viro@...IV.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mszeredi@...e.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] audit: clean up refcounting in audit-tree
On Mon, 2012-06-25 at 19:46 +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>
>
> Drop the initial reference by fsnotify_init_mark early instead of
> audit_tree_freeing_mark() at destroy time.
>
> In the cases we destroy the mark before we drop the initial reference we need to
> get rid of the get_mark that balances the put_mark in audit_tree_freeing_mark().
>
> Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>
I don't love this. The reference from fsnotify_init_mark() should live
until fsnotify_mark_destroy(). If we need to drop a reference in
audit_tree_freeing_mark() we should be taking that elsewhere....
> ---
> kernel/audit_tree.c | 12 +++++++++---
> 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/audit_tree.c b/kernel/audit_tree.c
> index 31fdc48..7b95706 100644
> --- a/kernel/audit_tree.c
> +++ b/kernel/audit_tree.c
> @@ -292,6 +292,7 @@ static void untag_chunk(struct node *p)
> spin_unlock(&hash_lock);
> spin_unlock(&entry->lock);
> fsnotify_destroy_mark(entry);
> + fsnotify_put_mark(&new->mark); /* drop initial reference */
> goto out;
>
> Fallback:
> @@ -330,7 +331,6 @@ static int create_chunk(struct inode *inode, struct audit_tree *tree)
> spin_unlock(&hash_lock);
> chunk->dead = 1;
> spin_unlock(&entry->lock);
> - fsnotify_get_mark(entry);
> fsnotify_destroy_mark(entry);
> fsnotify_put_mark(entry);
> return 0;
> @@ -346,6 +346,7 @@ static int create_chunk(struct inode *inode, struct audit_tree *tree)
> insert_hash(chunk);
> spin_unlock(&hash_lock);
> spin_unlock(&entry->lock);
> + fsnotify_put_mark(entry); /* drop initial reference */
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -411,7 +412,6 @@ static int tag_chunk(struct inode *inode, struct audit_tree *tree)
> spin_unlock(&chunk_entry->lock);
> spin_unlock(&old_entry->lock);
>
> - fsnotify_get_mark(chunk_entry);
> fsnotify_destroy_mark(chunk_entry);
>
> fsnotify_put_mark(chunk_entry);
> @@ -444,6 +444,7 @@ static int tag_chunk(struct inode *inode, struct audit_tree *tree)
> spin_unlock(&chunk_entry->lock);
> spin_unlock(&old_entry->lock);
> fsnotify_destroy_mark(old_entry);
> + fsnotify_put_mark(chunk_entry); /* drop initial reference */
> fsnotify_put_mark(old_entry); /* pair to fsnotify_find mark_entry */
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -915,7 +916,12 @@ static void audit_tree_freeing_mark(struct fsnotify_mark *entry, struct fsnotify
> struct audit_chunk *chunk = container_of(entry, struct audit_chunk, mark);
>
> evict_chunk(chunk);
> - fsnotify_put_mark(entry);
> +
> + /*
> + * We are guaranteed to have at least one reference to the mark from
> + * either the inode or the caller of fsnotify_destroy_mark().
> + */
> + BUG_ON(atomic_read(&entry->refcnt) < 1);
> }
>
> static bool audit_tree_send_event(struct fsnotify_group *group, struct inode *inode,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists