linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR is no longer experimental

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1341605949.22584.6.camel@x61.thuisdomein>
Date:	Fri, 06 Jul 2012 22:19:09 +0200
From:	Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
To:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR is no longer experimental

On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 10:58 -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> I rather just retire the whole concept of "Experimental".
> 
> it's really utterly meaningless in practice anyway.

See Russell King's quick survey in https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/1/18/397 :
almost all defconfigs had CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL enabled. I didn't recheck
since I'm sure little has changed. That macro and the related Kconfig
symbol seem indeed meaningless.


Paul Bolle

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/