[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1341606824.2214.14.camel@iscandar.digidescorp.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2012 15:33:44 -0500
From: "Steven J. Magnani" <steve@...idescorp.com>
To: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] fat (exportfs): reconnect file handles to evicted
inodes/dentries
On Wed, 2012-07-04 at 20:07 +0900, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
> Please don't add new lock_super() usage if it is not necessary. Almost
> all of lock_super() just replaced lock_kernel() usage. It rather should
> be removed in future. Probably, this should use inode->i_mutex instead.
>
> BTW, the above issue is same with all of directory read.
I don't think there's really an alternative here. The cases addressed by
this patch all involve walking on-disk structures via
unofficial/temporary inodes created from information in the NFS handle
(i.e., outside the normal inode creation paths). When this process is
successful we end up with "official" connected inodes/dentries, but
getting there is really a "bottom up" strategy instead of the usual "top
down" approach.
Because the "bottom up" method is lacking guarantees that "top down"
takes for granted - i.e., that a cluster on disk that's supposed to be a
directory actually *is* a directory - I am adding some defensive code
in the next spin of the patch.
Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists