linux-kernel - [PATCH] sched: Use task_rq_unlock on __sched

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1341647342-6742-1-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org>
Date:	Sat,  7 Jul 2012 16:49:02 +0900
From:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>
Subject: [PATCH] sched: Use task_rq_unlock on __sched_setscheduler

From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>

It seems there's no specific reason to open-code it.  I guess the
commit 0122ec5b02f76 ("sched: Add p->pi_lock to task_rq_lock()")
simply missed it.  Let's be consistent with others.

Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
---
 kernel/sched/core.c |    4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 3987b9ddc563..1327f4de2054 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -4343,9 +4343,7 @@ recheck:
 	 */
 	if (unlikely(policy == p->policy && (!rt_policy(policy) ||
 			param->sched_priority == p->rt_priority))) {
-
-		__task_rq_unlock(rq);
-		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->pi_lock, flags);
+		task_rq_unlock(rq, p, &flags);
 		return 0;
 	}
 
-- 
1.7.10.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/