[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FF9D2EF.7010901@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2012 14:35:27 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
Dan Smith <danms@...ibm.com>,
Bharata B Rao <bharata.rao@...il.com>,
Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 14/26] sched, numa: Numa balancer
On 03/16/2012 10:40 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
+static bool can_move_ne(struct numa_entity *ne)
+{
+ /*
+ * XXX: consider mems_allowed, stinking cpusets has mems_allowed
+ * per task and it can actually differ over a whole process, la-la-la.
+ */
+ return true;
+}
This looks like something that should be fixed before the
code is submitted for merging upstream.
--
All rights reversed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists