[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120708063340.GA19021@dhcp-172-17-108-109.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2012 23:33:40 -0700
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, shyju pv <shyju.pv@...wei.com>,
Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>,
Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>
Subject: [GIT PULL] cgroup fixes for 3.5-rc5
Hello, Linus.
The previous cgroup pull request contained a patch to fix a race
condition during cgroup hierarchy umount. Unfortunately, while the
patch reduced the race window such that the test case I and Sasha were
using didn't trigger it anymore, it wasn't complete - Shyju and Li
could reliably trigger the race condition using a different test case.
The problem wasn't the gap between dentry deletion and release which
the previous patch tried to fix. The window was between the last
dput() of a root's child and the resulting dput() of the root. For
cgroup dentries, the deletion and release always happen synchronously.
As this releases the s_active ref, the refcnt of the root dentry,
which doesn't hold s_active, stays above zero without the
corresponding s_active. If umount was in progress, the last
deactivate_super() proceeds to destory the superblock and triggers
BUG() on the non-zero root dentry refcnt after shrinking.
This issue surfaced because cgroup dentries are now allowed to linger
after rmdir(2) since 3.5-rc1. Before, rmdir synchronously drained the
dentry refcnt and the s_active acquired by rmdir from vfs layer
protected the whole thing. After 3.5-rc1, cgroup may internally hold
and put dentry refs after rmdir finishes and the delayed dput()
doesn't have surrounding s_active ref exposing this issue.
This pull request contains two patches - one reverting the previous
incorrect fix and the other adding the surrounding s_active ref around
the delayed dput().
This is quite late in the release cycle but the change is on the safer
side and fixes the test cases reliably, so I don't think it's too
crazy. Thanks.
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/cgroup.git for-3.5-fixes
Tejun Heo (2):
Revert "cgroup: superblock can't be released with active dentries"
cgroup: fix cgroup hierarchy umount race
kernel/cgroup.c | 23 ++++++++---------------
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup.c b/kernel/cgroup.c
index 2097684..b303dfc 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup.c
@@ -901,13 +901,10 @@ static void cgroup_diput(struct dentry *dentry, struct inode *inode)
mutex_unlock(&cgroup_mutex);
/*
- * We want to drop the active superblock reference from the
- * cgroup creation after all the dentry refs are gone -
- * kill_sb gets mighty unhappy otherwise. Mark
- * dentry->d_fsdata with cgroup_diput() to tell
- * cgroup_d_release() to call deactivate_super().
+ * Drop the active superblock reference that we took when we
+ * created the cgroup
*/
- dentry->d_fsdata = cgroup_diput;
+ deactivate_super(cgrp->root->sb);
/*
* if we're getting rid of the cgroup, refcount should ensure
@@ -933,13 +930,6 @@ static int cgroup_delete(const struct dentry *d)
return 1;
}
-static void cgroup_d_release(struct dentry *dentry)
-{
- /* did cgroup_diput() tell me to deactivate super? */
- if (dentry->d_fsdata == cgroup_diput)
- deactivate_super(dentry->d_sb);
-}
-
static void remove_dir(struct dentry *d)
{
struct dentry *parent = dget(d->d_parent);
@@ -1547,7 +1537,6 @@ static int cgroup_get_rootdir(struct super_block *sb)
static const struct dentry_operations cgroup_dops = {
.d_iput = cgroup_diput,
.d_delete = cgroup_delete,
- .d_release = cgroup_d_release,
};
struct inode *inode =
@@ -3894,8 +3883,12 @@ static void css_dput_fn(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct cgroup_subsys_state *css =
container_of(work, struct cgroup_subsys_state, dput_work);
+ struct dentry *dentry = css->cgroup->dentry;
+ struct super_block *sb = dentry->d_sb;
- dput(css->cgroup->dentry);
+ atomic_inc(&sb->s_active);
+ dput(dentry);
+ deactivate_super(sb);
}
static void init_cgroup_css(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists