linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARM: remove asm/locks.h

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 8 Jul 2012 17:03:12 +0100
From:	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To:	Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
Cc:	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: remove asm/locks.h

On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 08:20:30AM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-07-02 at 22:52 +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > Not sure I follow, but since this is all dead code I can't see any tests
> > failing without it.
> 
> The purpose of that disclaimer is to stress that only git commands were
> used to determine that removing this header is correct and safe. But
> perhaps saying that I therefore "tested" this patch with git commands is
> confusing.

Okey doke. Please can you put this into the patch system?

Cheers,

Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/