[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87k3yd5sxt.fsf@xmission.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2012 23:50:38 -0700
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, hacklu <embedway.linux@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86, boot: Optimize the elf header handling.
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> writes:
> On 07/01/2012 01:40 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>
>> So I have tracked down part of the crazyness.
>> CONFIG_RODATA actually uses 2MB alignment, making
>> -z max_page_size=4096 a bit questionable.
>>
>
> Questionable how? It's not really like it matters since we're not going
> to mmap the ELF.
Questionable as in the current elf loader in misc.c relies on the fact
that there is an almost a fixed offset between physical addresses and
file offsets for all of the PT_LOAD segments in the Elf header.
In fact CONFIG_RODATA && CONFIG_X86_64 && CONFIG_SMP in combination with
-z max_page_size=4096 fails to boot. The Elf loader in misc.c starts
coping from lower addresses to higher addresses, instead of higher
addresses to lower and that fails miserably.
But -z max_page_size=4096 is not the problem the ELF loader is.
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists