[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FFA39B6.4010903@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2012 19:53:58 -0600
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
CC: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: perf lock record fails
On 7/6/12 7:06 PM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hi, David
>
> On Fri, 06 Jul 2012 11:27:39 -0600, David Ahern wrote:
>> What config options need to be enabled for 'perf lock record' to work?
>> I tried a number of custom builds and stock Fedora kernels. I always
>> get:
>>
>> $ perf lock record -- sleep 1
>> invalid or unsupported event: 'lock:lock_acquire'
>>
>> Though trace_lock_acquire exists, CONFIG_LOCKDEP is set, and ftrace is
>> enabled.
>>
>> What am I missing?
>>
>
> Weird. AFAICS lock_acquire and lock_release depend on CONFIG_LOCKDEP,
> and lock_acquired and lock_contented depend on CONFIG_LOCK_STAT (I guess
> it should be warned/commented somewhere?). Maybe CONFIG_EVENT_TRACING?
CONFIG_EVENT_TRACING is set.
I started a comparison with other tracepoints to see if I can decipher
why they show up but none of the trace functions for the lock system do
(e.g., lock_acquire), but haven't had much time to spend on it. I was
hoping Steve or Frederic could explain it quicker. ;-)
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists