[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120709110154.GB9186@hmsreliant.think-freely.org>
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 07:01:54 -0400
From: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, lizefan@...wei.com, tj@...nel.org,
Gao feng <gaofeng@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: cgroup: fix out of bounds accesses
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 09:45:10AM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
>
> dev->priomap is allocated by extend_netdev_table() called from
> update_netdev_tables().
> And this is only called if write_priomap() is called.
>
> But if write_priomap() is not called, it seems we can have out of bounds
> accesses in cgrp_destroy(), read_priomap() & skb_update_prio()
>
> With help from Gao Feng
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> Cc: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
> Cc: Gao feng <gaofeng@...fujitsu.com>
> ---
> net/core/dev.c | 8 ++++++--
> net/core/netprio_cgroup.c | 4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
Thank you for doing this Eric, Gao. Just to be sure (I asked in the previous
thread), would it be better to avoid the length check in skb_update_prio, and
instead update the netdev tables to be long enough in cgrp_create and in
netprio_device_event on device registration?
Neil
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists