lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 9 Jul 2012 12:15:57 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	王艇艇 <wtt_usst@....com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lrg@...mlogic.co.uk
Subject: Re: Ask a question about regulator always_on and boot_on

On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 10:29:54AM +0800, 王艇艇 wrote:

> Sorry to bother you.

You appear to be asking exactly the same question as you asked last
week (and this is also the second time you asked today...).
Unsurprisingly the answer is also exactly the same.

> When I set the regulator always_on and boot_on item as 0 at the initial stage.

> The regulator should not enabled, right?

No.  always_on means that the regulator will never be disabled.  boot_on
means that the regulator is expacted to

> Why not add these code for the obvious operation to disable the regulator at initial stage?

The goal is still that the system specifies full constraints which means
that any unused regulators are powered down.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ