[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1341835552.3462.50.camel@twins>
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 14:05:52 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
Dan Smith <danms@...ibm.com>,
Bharata B Rao <bharata.rao@...il.com>,
Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 14/26] sched, numa: Numa balancer
On Sat, 2012-07-07 at 14:26 -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > +/*
> > + * Assumes symmetric NUMA -- that is, each node is of equal size.
> > + */
> > +static void set_max_mem_load(unsigned long load)
> > +{
> > + unsigned long old_load;
> > +
> > + spin_lock(&max_mem_load.lock);
> > + old_load = max_mem_load.load;
> > + if (!old_load)
> > + old_load = load;
> > + max_mem_load.load = (old_load + load) >> 1;
> > + spin_unlock(&max_mem_load.lock);
> > +}
>
> The above in your patch kind of conflicts with this bit
> from patch 6/26:
Yeah,.. its pretty broken. Its also effectively disabled, but yeah.
> Looking at how the memory load code is used, I wonder
> if it would make sense to count "zone size - free - inactive
> file" pages instead?
Something like that, although I guess we'd want a sum over all zones in
a node for that.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists