[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120709125622.GD9186@hmsreliant.think-freely.org>
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 08:56:22 -0400
From: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, lizefan@...wei.com, tj@...nel.org,
Gao feng <gaofeng@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: cgroup: fix out of bounds accesses
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 02:40:25PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 08:13 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 01:50:52PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 07:01 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thank you for doing this Eric, Gao. Just to be sure (I asked in the previous
> > > > thread), would it be better to avoid the length check in skb_update_prio, and
> > > > instead update the netdev tables to be long enough in cgrp_create and in
> > > > netprio_device_event on device registration?
> > >
> > > Yes probably, and it is even needed because extend_netdev_table() can
> > > acutally fail to expand the table if kzalloc() returned NULL.
> > >
> > > Current code just ignores this allocation failure so we also can crash
> > > in write_priomap()
> > >
> > ACK, can you follow up with a patch please?
>
> Gao was working on this allocation problem (he privately sent me a v1 of
> his patch), so I think we can wait Gao submit a v2 to combine all the
> work/ideas in a single patch.
>
> (ie make sure we dont need additional bound checkings in fast path)
>
>
Ok, I agree. thanks!
Neil
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists