linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm: Warn about costly page allocation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120709131942.GA3594@barrios>
Date:	Mon, 9 Jul 2012 22:19:42 +0900
From:	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
To:	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Cc:	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Warn about costly page allocation

On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 02:05:51PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 09:50:48PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > > <SNIP>
> > > 
> > > You're aiming this at embedded QA people according to your changelog so
> > > do whatever you think is going to be the most effective. It's already
> > > "known" that high-order kernel allocations are meant to be unreliable and
> > > apparently this is being ignored. The in-code warning could look
> > > something like
> > > 
> > > if (unlikely(order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER)) {
> > > 	printk_once("%s: page allocation high-order stupidity: order:%d, mode:0x%x\n",
> > >                    current->comm, order, gfp_mask);
> > > 	if (gfp_flags & __GFP_MOVABLE) {
> > > 		printk_once("Enable compaction or whatever\n");
> > > 		dump_stack();
> > > 	} else {
> > > 		printk_once("Regular high-order kernel allocations like this will eventually start failing.");
> > > 		dump_stack();
> > > 	}
> > > }
> > 
> > I'm not sure we have to check further for __GFP_MOVABLE because I have not seen driver
> > uses __GFP_MOVABLE for high order allocation. Although it uses the flag, it's never
> > compactable since it's out of LRU list. So I think it's rather overkill.
> > 
> 
> Then I would have considered it even more important to warn them that
> their specific usage is going to break eventually, with or without
> compaction. However, you know the target audience for this warning so it's
> your call.
> 
> > > 
> > > There should be a comment above it giving more information if you think
> > > the embedded people will actually read it. Of course, if this warning
> > > triggers during driver initialisation then it might be a completely useless.
> > > You could rate limit the warning (printk_ratelimit()) instead to be more
> > > effective. As I don't know what sort of device drivers you are seeing this
> > > problem with I can't judge what the best style of warning would be.
> > 
> > Okay.
> > I will send patch like below tomorrow if there isn't any objection.
> > 
> > if (unlikely(order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER)) {
> > 	if (printk_ratelimit()) {
> > 		printk("%s: page allocation high-order stupidity: order:%d, mode:0x%x\n",
> > 			current->comm, order, gfp_mask);
> > 		printk_once("Enable compaction or whatever\n");
> > 		printk_once("Regular high-order kernel allocations like this will eventually start failing.\n");

s/printk_once/printk/g
Copy&Paste should go away. :(

> > 		dump_stack();
> > 	}
> > }
> 
> The warning message could be improved. I did not expect you to use "Enable
> compaction or whatever" verbatim. I was just illustrating what type of
> warnings I thought might be useful. I expected you would change it to
> something that embedded driver authors would pay attention to :)

Okay.

> 
> As you are using printk_ratelimit(), you can also use pr_warning to
> annotate this as KERN_WARNING.

Will do.
Thanks, Mel.

> 
> -- 
> Mel Gorman
> SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/