[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120709133154.GK1296@pengutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 15:31:54 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>
To: "Liu, Chuansheng" <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
"khali@...ux-fr.org" <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
"ben-linux@...ff.org" <ben-linux@...ff.org>,
"Yanmin Zhang <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>
(yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com)" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Tu, Xiaobing" <xiaobing.tu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c_dw: deadlock happening when system is trying to
suspend
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 02:29:13PM +0000, Liu, Chuansheng wrote:
> From: liu chuansheng <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] i2c_dw: deadlock happening when system is trying to suspend
>
> In i2c_dw code, there is a race condition that causes pm suspend
> thread blocking there always. The scenerio is as below:
>
> PM thread:
> suspend -->
> pm_suspend -->
> enter_state -->
> dpm_suspend_start(will call i2c_dw_pci_suspend(),
> and the dw_i2c_dev->lock is hold)
> ...
> suspend_enter -->
> dpm_suspend_noirq -->
> suspend_device_irqs -->
> synchronize_irq()
>
> synchronize_irq will wait for any pending irq is handled, and
> the correpsonding irq thread is finished.
>
> In this case, there is a i2c device interrupt is pending, the irq
> thread do the below things:
> IRQ thread:
> i2c_smbus_read_byte_data -->
> i2c_smbus_xfer -->
> i2c_transfer -->
> i2c_dw_xfer -->
> down()
>
> The irq thread blocked at down dw_i2c_dev->lock, because in PM thread,
> it has been hold after calling i2c_dw_pci_suspend(), but PM thread is
> waiting for IRQ thread, then deadlock happened.
>
> The solution is moving the down() action after pm_runtime_get_sync().
>
> Signed-off-by: liu chuansheng <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
> ---
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-core.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-core.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-core.c
> index 1e48bec..748ecb1 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-core.c
> @@ -512,8 +512,8 @@ i2c_dw_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct i2c_msg msgs[], int num)
>
> dev_dbg(dev->dev, "%s: msgs: %d\n", __func__, num);
>
> - mutex_lock(&dev->lock);
> pm_runtime_get_sync(dev->dev);
> + mutex_lock(&dev->lock);
>
> INIT_COMPLETION(dev->cmd_complete);
> dev->msgs = msgs;
Don't you need to place the mutex_unlock() before pm_runtime_put then?
Thanks,
Wolfram
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists