linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/36] AArch64 Linux kernel port

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120709132420.GF3934@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date:	Mon, 9 Jul 2012 14:56:26 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
Cc:	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/36] AArch64 Linux kernel port

On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 02:06:29PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:

> There's ongoing discussion about unifying ACPI and ftd representation, 
> and once that's done this isn't a problem, but right now there's no 

Where is this discussion?

> terribly straightforward way to do this without a lot of basically 
> boilerplate code. The biggest issue is that ACPI has a very different 
> idea about event delivery and we'd need some way to abstract that.

Right, but there's lots of bolierplate code with this stuff anyway and
it's not fundamentally hard.  Last time I looked at ACPI it had a rather
different model for how all this stuff would work than DT did which
isn't terribly helpful here.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)