[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1341845277.2215.10.camel@iscandar.digidescorp.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 09:47:57 -0500
From: "Steven J. Magnani" <steve@...idescorp.com>
To: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] fat (exportfs): reconnect file handles to evicted
inodes/dentries
On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 22:43 +0900, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
> "Steven J. Magnani" <steve@...idescorp.com> writes:
>
> >> We need the key, possible key is - if it is only directory, FAT may be
> >> able to use i_start as additional search key.
> >
> > Interesting idea. I think this, and reformulating the FAT NFS file
> > handle to include the parent's i_ino, will greatly simplify (and speed
> > up) the code.
>
> Does it work even if the inode was rename()'ed?
AFAICT. I don't see why it wouldn't; on a rename, the inode's i_pos
changes but its i_ino stays the same, right?
Do you have any objection to making the use of a directory logstart
cache a mount option that defaults to off? It seems a shame to penalize
everyone - particularly embedded systems - with the overhead of such a
cache when FAT-backed-NFS seems to be such a small percentage of use
cases.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Steven J. Magnani "I claim this network for MARS!
www.digidescorp.com Earthling, return my space modulator!"
#include <standard.disclaimer>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists