[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120709161448.GA17595@phenom.dumpdata.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 12:14:49 -0400
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/4] xen/p2m: Optimize the
get_phys_to_machine function a bit.
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 04:41:24PM +0100, David Vrabel wrote:
> On 03/07/12 16:40, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > Running perf tells me that the check for p2m_identity
> > is done a lot - more than it should.
>
> This patch doesn't change the how often the check is done. Is this just
> bad wording of the description?
Its bad wording plus it really does not change the assmebler code - I thought
it did but since there is only one "if" case it does not matter how
much I put unlikely in front of it - it is the only branch condition.
Perhaps if I make the code be put in a variable (register) that would
optimize this a bit more...
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/xen/p2m.c | 2 +-
> > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/p2m.c b/arch/x86/xen/p2m.c
> > index 64effdc..161bcdc 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/xen/p2m.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/xen/p2m.c
> > @@ -406,7 +406,7 @@ unsigned long get_phys_to_machine(unsigned long pfn)
> > * and in p2m_*missing, so returning the INVALID_P2M_ENTRY
> > * would be wrong.
> > */
> > - if (p2m_top[topidx][mididx] == p2m_identity)
> > + if (unlikely(p2m_top[topidx][mididx] == p2m_identity))
> > return IDENTITY_FRAME(pfn);
> >
> > return p2m_top[topidx][mididx][idx];
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists