[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1341853758.2215.34.camel@iscandar.digidescorp.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 12:09:18 -0500
From: "Steven J. Magnani" <steve@...idescorp.com>
To: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] fat (exportfs): reconnect file handles to evicted
inodes/dentries
On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 11:27 -0500, Steven J. Magnani wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 01:10 +0900, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
> > "Steven J. Magnani" <steve@...idescorp.com> writes:
> >
> > > On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 22:43 +0900, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
> > >> "Steven J. Magnani" <steve@...idescorp.com> writes:
> > >>
> > >> >> We need the key, possible key is - if it is only directory, FAT may be
> > >> >> able to use i_start as additional search key.
> > >> >
> > >> > Interesting idea. I think this, and reformulating the FAT NFS file
> > >> > handle to include the parent's i_ino, will greatly simplify (and speed
> > >> > up) the code.
> > >>
> > >> Does it work even if the inode was rename()'ed?
> > >
> > > AFAICT. I don't see why it wouldn't; on a rename, the inode's i_pos
> > > changes but its i_ino stays the same, right?
> >
> > If the inode is not on cache anymore, is there the possibility that
> > selects the wrong parent? IIRC, NFS Server can be rebooted at any time
> > while the client using the same file handle.
>
> True, but it's looking like we can just use the default handle
> constructed by export_encode_fh(), namely (i_ino, i_generation,
> parent->i_ino, parent->i_generation). None of those components should
> change in a server reboot.
I think I misunderstood you when I wrote this. I assumed we were talking
about a restart of nfsd, not the entire machine it was running on. If
there is a danger of mismapping on a reboot isn't that present in the
existing mainline code, i.e. fat_fh_to_dentry()? Ideally, the (i_ino,
i_generation) signature would be different on a reboot, although with
only 2-second granularity in i_generation I suppose that's less likely
than we would prefer. Also I would think that many inodes simply
wouldn't exist in the cache, in which case we would fail the operation
with ESTALE.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Steven J. Magnani "I claim this network for MARS!
www.digidescorp.com Earthling, return my space modulator!"
#include <standard.disclaimer>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists