linux-kernel - Re: 3.5-rc6 printk formatting problem during oom-kill.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPXgP11oP4aKyg=HUNrb3z_ZbPjU+_u338sD6uhxKyJ43Z8sgQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 9 Jul 2012 20:27:57 +0200
From:	Kay Sievers <kay@...y.org>
To:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Kay Sievers <kay@...y.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartmann <greg@...ah.com>
Subject: Re: 3.5-rc6 printk formatting problem during oom-kill.

On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com> wrote:
> I noticed that the format of the oom-killer output seems to have changed, and
> now it spews stuff like..
>
> [49461.758070] lowmem_reserve[]:
> [49461.758071]  0
> [49461.758071]  2643
> [49461.758071]  3878
> [49461.758072]  3878
> [49461.758072]
> [49461.758072] Node 0

> Does the oom-killer code need modifying, or the printk code ?
> I know there's been some regressions in this area recently, but this is still
> happening on the current tree (8c84bf4166a4698296342841a549bbee03860ac0)

This likely fixes it:
  http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/kay/patches.git;a=blob;f=kmsg-merge-cont.patch;hb=HEAD

Let me check if it does, and if I can reproduce it.

Thanks,
Kay
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/