[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FFA4EFD.6090708@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 11:24:45 +0800
From: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@...el.com>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
CC: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>, khali@...ux-fr.org,
ben-linux@...ff.org, w.sang@...gutronix.de, lenb@...nel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jkosina@...e.cz, chatty@...c.fr,
jj_ding@....com.tw, bhelgaas@...gle.com, abelay@....edu
Subject: Re: Fwd: Hid over I2C and ACPI interaction
On 2012年07月06日 13:52, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 03:01:57PM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
>> +Note that although these are ACPI devices, we prefer to use PnP drivers
>> for them,
>> +this is because:
>> +1. all the non-ACPI-predefined Devices are exported as PnP devices as
>> well
>> +2. PnP bus is a well designed bus. Probing via PnP layer saves a lot of
>> work
>> + for the device driver, e.g. getting& parsing ACPI resources.
>
> (Nice BKM, thanks for sharing)
>
> I have few questions about using PnP drivers instead of pure ACPI drivers.
>
> ACPI 5.0 defined some new resources, for example "Fixed DMA descriptor"
> that has information about the request line + channel for the device to
> use. Hovewer, PnP drivers pass resources as 'struct resource', which
> basically only has start and end - how do you represent all this new stuff
> using 'struct resource'?
>
I think we can add new interface to get acpi specific resources. e.g
struct acpi_resource pnp_get_acpi_resource(...). When the pnp acpi devices
were initialized, put those acpi specific resources into a new resource list
pnpdev->acpi_resources. What pnp_get_acpi_resource does is to get specified
type acpi resources and return. We also need to define some acpi resource types.
ACPI_RESOURCE_DMA
ACPI_RESOURCE_I2C_SERIALBUS
ACPI_RESOURCE_SPI_SERIALBUS
ACPI_RESOURCE_UART_SERIALBUS
ACPI_RESOURCE_COMMON_SERIALBUS
...
How about this? welcome to comments.
> Or should we use acpi_walk_resources() where 'struct resource' is not
> suitable?
>
--
Best Regards
Tianyu Lan
linux kernel enabling team
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists