lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 06:34:53 +0900 From: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp> To: "Steven J. Magnani" <steve@...idescorp.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] fat (exportfs): reconnect file handles to evicted inodes/dentries "Steven J. Magnani" <steve@...idescorp.com> writes: >> Ah, i_ino. I was talking about i_pos. Well, so, what happens if the >> child was renamed to other parent on NFS server machine (not via nfs >> client)? The file handle would be including the old i_ino, and the old >> i_ino on file handle is still vaild as old parent. So, it returns the >> wrong parent? > > Yes, but I believe exportfs_decode_fh() handles that case: > > /* > * Now that we've got both a well-connected parent and a > * dentry for the inode we're after, make sure that our > * inode is actually connected to the parent. > */ > > > Really, the FAT NFS code will pretty much parallel that of ext2. Hm, not really, if the file handle is including parent ino. ext2 will get the latest parent ino, because it checks parent of inode of file handle. But if the file handle is including parent ino and we believe it is parent, I think NFS server can be return the old parent. The difference is the result of ->get_parent(). -- OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists