linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm/memcg: mem_cgroup_relize_xxx_limit can guarantee memcg->res.limit <= memcg->memsw.limit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4FFA61BC.4020102@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Mon, 09 Jul 2012 13:44:44 +0900
From:	Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Wanpeng Li <liwp.linux@...il.com>
CC:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/memcg: mem_cgroup_relize_xxx_limit can guarantee memcg->res.limit
 <= memcg->memsw.limit

(2012/07/06 12:21), Wanpeng Li wrote:
> From: Wanpeng Li <liwp@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <liwp.linux@...il.com>

Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>

Could you merge all 'commentary fixes' into a patch ?


> ---
>   mm/memcontrol.c |    4 ++--
>   1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 4b64fe0..a501660 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -3418,7 +3418,7 @@ static int mem_cgroup_resize_limit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
>   		/*
>   		 * Rather than hide all in some function, I do this in
>   		 * open coded manner. You see what this really does.
> -		 * We have to guarantee memcg->res.limit < memcg->memsw.limit.
> +		 * We have to guarantee memcg->res.limit <= memcg->memsw.limit.
>   		 */
>   		mutex_lock(&set_limit_mutex);
>   		memswlimit = res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->memsw, RES_LIMIT);
> @@ -3479,7 +3479,7 @@ static int mem_cgroup_resize_memsw_limit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
>   		/*
>   		 * Rather than hide all in some function, I do this in
>   		 * open coded manner. You see what this really does.
> -		 * We have to guarantee memcg->res.limit < memcg->memsw.limit.
> +		 * We have to guarantee memcg->res.limit <= memcg->memsw.limit.
>   		 */
>   		mutex_lock(&set_limit_mutex);
>   		memlimit = res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->res, RES_LIMIT);
> 



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/