linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] pwm: add lpc32xx pwm support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 10 Jul 2012 10:00:03 +0200
From:	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...onic-design.de>
To:	Roland Stigge <stigge@...com.de>
Cc:	Alexandre Pereira da Silva <aletes.xgr@...il.com>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pwm: add lpc32xx pwm support

On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 09:56:08AM +0200, Roland Stigge wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 07/10/2012 08:48 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> >> --- /dev/null +++
> >> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/lpc32xx-pwm.txt @@ -0,0
> >> +1,12 @@ +LPC32XX PWM controller + +Required properties: +-
> >> compatible: should be "nxp,lpc3220-pwm"
> > 
> > Does the compatible have to be lpc3220-pwm? Can't it be lpc32xx-pwm
> > to match the driver and binding names?
> 
> When creating the other NXP LPC compatible strings, we agreed on
> taking the first LPC32xx chip, i.e., lpc3220, as prefix. (There are 4
> of them, -20, -30, -40, -50, most of them supporting things available
> in lpc3220.)
> 
> So lpc3220-pwm looks good here.

I see, that makes sense.

Thierry

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped