[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1341910360.3462.99.camel@twins>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 10:52:40 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, hpa@...or.com,
eranian@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
fweisbec@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org,
Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Subject: Re: [tip:perf/core] perf/x86: Fix USER/KERNEL tagging of samples
On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 10:21 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Another boundary condition would be when we intentionally
> twiddle the GDT: such as during suspend or during BIOS upcalls.
> Can we then get a PMU interrupt? If yes then this will probably
> result in garbage:
>
> > > > + desc = __this_cpu_ptr(&gdt_page.gdt[0]);
>
> it won't outright crash, we don't ever deallocate our GDT - but
> it will return a garbage RIP.
Nothing we can do about that though..
> Then there's also all the Xen craziness with segments ...
I don't think Xen Dom0 has PMU access, that would be their Hyper-visor
thingy's job, no?
Anyway, that seems a problem for Jeremy and Konrad..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists