[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1341926849.2909.28.camel@oc2024037011.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 08:27:29 -0500
From: Andrew Theurer <habanero@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
S390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
Carsten Otte <cotte@...ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, chegu vinod <chegu_vinod@...com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, X86 <x86@...nel.org>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>, linux390@...ibm.com,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <srivatsa.vaddagiri@...il.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] kvm: Improving directed yield in PLE handler
On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 17:24 +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote:
> On 07/10/2012 03:17 AM, Andrew Theurer wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 11:50 +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote:
> >> Currently Pause Looop Exit (PLE) handler is doing directed yield to a
> >> random VCPU on PL exit. Though we already have filtering while choosing
> >> the candidate to yield_to, we can do better.
> >
> > Hi, Raghu.
> >
> [...]
> >
> > Can you briefly explain the 1x and 2x configs? This of course is highly
> > dependent whether or not HT is enabled...
> >
>
> Sorry if I had not made very clear in earlier threads. Have you applied
> Rik's following patch for base. without this you could see some
> inconsistent results perhaps.
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/6/19/401
Yes, I do have that applied with your patch and in my baseline.
-Andrew Theurer
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists