[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FFC2F95.7080003@msgid.tls.msk.ru>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 17:35:17 +0400
From: Michael Tokarev <mjt@....msk.ru>
To: Andrew Hunter <ahh@...gle.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] core-kernel: use multiply instead of shifts in hash_64
On 03.07.2012 00:25, Andrew Hunter wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/hash.h b/include/linux/hash.h
> index b80506b..daabc3d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/hash.h
> +++ b/include/linux/hash.h
> @@ -34,7 +34,9 @@
> static inline u64 hash_64(u64 val, unsigned int bits)
> {
> u64 hash = val;
> -
> +#if BITS_PER_LONG == 64
> + hash *= GOLDEN_RATIO_PRIME_64;
> +#else
> /* Sigh, gcc can't optimise this alone like it does for 32 bits. */
Hmm. Does this comment make sense here now?
Thanks,
/mjt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists