[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120710144046.GB15912@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 07:40:46 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Gerard Snitselaar <dev@...tselaar.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
balbi@...com, kishon@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: twl6030-usb: variable otg not declared in
twl6030_usbotg_irq() in linux-next
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 11:32:20PM -0700, Gerard Snitselaar wrote:
> commit ff9cce82 added back 2 lines that were removed by commit
> c83a8542 causing build of twl6030-usb to get an error due to otg being
> referenced, but not declared. This patch removes those 2 lines again
> to restore intent of commit c83a8542.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gerard Snitselaar <dev@...tselaar.org>
> ---
> drivers/usb/otg/twl6030-usb.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/otg/twl6030-usb.c b/drivers/usb/otg/twl6030-usb.c
> index a3d0c04..6907d8d 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/otg/twl6030-usb.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/otg/twl6030-usb.c
> @@ -302,8 +302,6 @@ static irqreturn_t twl6030_usbotg_irq(int irq, void *_twl)
> twl6030_writeb(twl, TWL_MODULE_USB, 0x1, USB_ID_INT_EN_HI_CLR);
> twl6030_writeb(twl, TWL_MODULE_USB, 0x10, USB_ID_INT_EN_HI_SET);
> status = OMAP_MUSB_ID_GROUND;
> - otg->default_a = true;
> - twl->phy.state = OTG_STATE_A_IDLE;
Didn't I apply this same patch yesterday? Can you verify that this is
still needed in the usb-next branch of my git tree?
confused,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists