[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120710154829.GA9222@suse.de>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 16:48:30 +0100
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
To: JoonSoo Kim <js1304@...il.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: don't invoke __alloc_pages_direct_compact when order
0
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 12:24:41AM +0900, JoonSoo Kim wrote:
> > That would be functionally similar to your patch but it will preserve git
> > blame, churn less code and be harder to make mistakes with in the unlikely
> > event a third call to alloc_pages_direct_compact is ever added.
>
> Your suggestion looks good.
> But, the size of page_alloc.o is more than before.
>
> I test 3 approaches, vanilla, always_inline and
> wrapping(alloc_page_direct_compact which is your suggestion).
> In my environment (v3.5-rc5, gcc 4.6.3, x86_64), page_alloc.o shows
> below number.
>
> total, .text section, .text.unlikely
> page_alloc_vanilla.o: 93432, 0x510a, 0x243
> page_alloc_inline.o: 93336, 0x52ca, 0xa4
> page_alloc_wrapping.o: 93528, 0x515a, 0x238
>
> Andrew said that inlining add only 26 bytes to .text of page_alloc.o,
> but in my system, need more bytes.
> Currently, I think this patch doesn't have obvious benefit, so I want
> to drop it.
> Any objections?
>
No objections to dropping the patch. It was at worth looking at so thanks
for that.
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists