linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 04/13] rbtree: move some implementation details from rbtree.h to rbtree.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 10 Jul 2012 16:12:54 -0700
From:	Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>
To:	Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>
Cc:	aarcange@...hat.com, dwmw2@...radead.org, riel@...hat.com,
	peterz@...radead.org, daniel.santos@...ox.com, axboe@...nel.dk,
	ebiederm@...ssion.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/13] rbtree: move some implementation details from
 rbtree.h to rbtree.c

On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 5:19 AM, Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 01:35:14 +0200, Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com> wrote:
>> +#define        RB_RED          0
>> +#define        RB_BLACK        1
>
> Interestingly, those are almost never used. RB_BLACK is used only once.
> Should we get rid of those instead?  Or change the code (like rb_is_red())
> to use them?

I'm actually making heavier use of RB_RED / RB_BLACK later on in the patch set.
But agree, rb_is_red() / rb_is_black() could use these too.

-- 
Michel "Walken" Lespinasse
A program is never fully debugged until the last user dies.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/