[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120711075235.GA27353@core.coreip.homeip.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 00:52:35 -0700
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: Roland Stigge <stigge@...com.de>
Cc: axel.lin@...il.com, riyer@...dia.com, michael.hennerich@...log.com,
grant.likely@...retlab.ca, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
kevin.wells@....com, srinivas.bakki@....com,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, rob.herring@...xeda.com,
aletes.xgr@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9] input: keyboard: Add keys driver for the LPC32xx SoC
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 09:49:04AM +0200, Roland Stigge wrote:
> On 07/10/2012 10:55 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > Hi Roland,
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 09:35:10PM +0200, Roland Stigge wrote:
> >> This patch adds a driver for the key scan interface of the LPC32xx SoC
> >>
> >
> > Could of more things that I had in my patch but forgot to specifically
> > call out:
> >
> >> +
> >> + /* Configure the key scanner */
> >> + clk_prepare_enable(kscandat->clk);
> >
> > This may fail so we should handle errors.
> >
> >> + writel(kscandat->deb_clks, LPC32XX_KS_DEB(kscandat->kscan_base));
> >> + writel(kscandat->scan_delay, LPC32XX_KS_SCAN_CTL(kscandat->kscan_base));
> >> + writel(LPC32XX_KSCAN_FTST_USE32K_CLK,
> >> + LPC32XX_KS_FAST_TST(kscandat->kscan_base));
> >> + writel(kscandat->matrix_sz,
> >> + LPC32XX_KS_MATRIX_DIM(kscandat->kscan_base));
> >> + writel(1, LPC32XX_KS_IRQ(kscandat->kscan_base));
> >> + clk_disable_unprepare(kscandat->clk);
> >> +
> >> + error = request_irq(irq, lpc32xx_kscan_irq, 0, pdev->name, kscandat);
> >
> > ...
> >
> >> +
> >> + free_irq(platform_get_irq(pdev, 0), pdev);
> >
> > You are requesting IRQ with kscandat as an argument but freeing it with
> > 'pdev' which will fail.
> >
> >> +
> >> + if (kscandat->input->users) {
> >> + /* Enable clock and clear IRQ */
> >> + clk_prepare_enable(kscandat->clk);
> >
> > Need to handle errors here as well.
> >
> > Since I am partial to my rearrangement (basically I started preferring
> > err_<action> style of error labels as they more explanatory than out2 or
> > fail3 style of labels), could you try this version of my patch (on top
> > of your v9 one). Third time is a charm maybe? :)
>
> Yes, works fine!
>
> Thanks!
>
> Acked-by: Roland Stigge <stigge@...com.de>
Excellent, I'll fold it up into your original v9 patch and queue for
3.6.
Thank you for your patience.
--
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists