[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120711123055.293267de@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 12:30:55 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/36] AArch64 Linux kernel port
> What if they add 64-bit ARM support to arch/x86? AFAIK some of the
> machines are going to be basically PCs, including legacy I/O, ACPI
> and UEFI, so they are much closer to that than they are to anything
> in arch/arm. The instruction set of course is different, but you
> already said that this doesn't matter.
ACPI5 doesn't require legacy I/O although I guess as before people will
be reusing x86 components and might do so for hardware reasons.
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists