linux-kernel - [RFC PATCH] tun: don't zeroize sock->file on detach

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 11 Jul 2012 15:48:20 +0400
From:	Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@...allels.com>
To:	davem@...emloft.net
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, ruanzhijie@...mail.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH] tun: don't zeroize sock->file on detach

This is a fix for bug, introduced in 3.4 kernel by commit
1ab5ecb90cb6a3df1476e052f76a6e8f6511cb3d, which, among other things, replaced
simple sock_put() by sk_release_kernel(). Below is sequence, which leads to
oops for non-persistent devices:

tun_chr_close()
tun_detach()				<== tun->socket.file = NULL
tun_free_netdev()
sk_release_sock()
sock_release(sock->file == NULL)
iput(SOCK_INODE(sock))			<== dereference on NULL pointer

This patch just removes zeroing of socket's file from __tun_detach().
sock_release() will do this.

Signed-off-by: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@...allels.com>
---
 drivers/net/tun.c |    1 -
 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c
index 987aeef..c1639f3 100644
--- a/drivers/net/tun.c
+++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
@@ -185,7 +185,6 @@ static void __tun_detach(struct tun_struct *tun)
 	netif_tx_lock_bh(tun->dev);
 	netif_carrier_off(tun->dev);
 	tun->tfile = NULL;
-	tun->socket.file = NULL;
 	netif_tx_unlock_bh(tun->dev);
 
 	/* Drop read queue */

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/