[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201207111233.24780.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 12:33:24 +0000
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Roland Stigge <stigge@...com.de>
Cc: "Russell King - ARM Linux" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
arm@...nel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kevin.wells@....com,
srinivas.bakki@....com, aletes.xgr@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/23] ARM: LPC32xx: Add DMA configuration to platform data
On Wednesday 11 July 2012, Roland Stigge wrote:
> Thanks for the note! Looks like the interface consolidated to replace
> ch->cd->min_signal with sth. like cd->min_signal directly.
>
> Accessing the signal id/number is/was quite convenient because as you
> can see in the 3 above cases that now get compile errors with the pl08x
> changes, the LPC32xx chip hard-wires those numbers, and the respective
> code is LPC32xx specific anyway.
>
> So can we make an exception here to compare static dma channel numbers?
> Or is there any other interface to access the static dma channel numbers
> that I'm currently not aware of?
>
> Depending on what we agree upon, I can then provide fixes to the
> lpc32xx-next branch.
I'm not familiar with this code, but I think the solution for now
(while we don't have a DT binding) is to do the same thing that
spear3xx does: pass a pointer to the global pl08x_filter_id
function and an identifier for the channel in the platform data
for that device.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists