linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/6] USB: serial: Changes to conform with checkpatch.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 11 Jul 2012 08:08:35 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Ben Minerds <puzzleduck@...il.com>
Cc:	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, richard.weinberger@...il.com,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] USB: serial: Changes to conform with checkpatch.

On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 12:10:14AM +1000, Ben Minerds wrote:
> Removed various checkpatch.sh warnings and errors. 
> Split patch by warning/error type.
> Corrected line wraps in emails.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ben Minerds <puzzleduck@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/usb/serial/keyspan.c |  106 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>  1 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)

I don't understand, is this 0/6 patch a "real" patch that should be
applied, or is it just a summary of the 1-6 patches all together?

Normally the 0/6 email is a text summary, and maybe the diffstat of the
whole patchset.  But not a patch itself with a signed-off-by line.

confused,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/