[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <op.whagvbgg3l0zgt@mpn-glaptop>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 17:48:37 +0200
From: "Michal Nazarewicz" <mina86@...a86.com>
To: "Michel Lespinasse" <walken@...gle.com>
Cc: aarcange@...hat.com, dwmw2@...radead.org, riel@...hat.com,
peterz@...radead.org, daniel.santos@...ox.com, axboe@...nel.dk,
ebiederm@...ssion.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/13] rbtree: move some implementation details from
rbtree.h to rbtree.c
On Wed, 11 Jul 2012 01:12:54 +0200, Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 5:19 AM, Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 01:35:14 +0200, Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com> wrote:
>>> +#define RB_RED 0
>>> +#define RB_BLACK 1
>>
>> Interestingly, those are almost never used. RB_BLACK is used only once.
>> Should we get rid of those instead? Or change the code (like rb_is_red())
>> to use them?
>
> I'm actually making heavier use of RB_RED / RB_BLACK later on in the patch set.
Yeah, I've just noticed. Disregard my comment.
> But agree, rb_is_red() / rb_is_black() could use these too.
--
Best regards, _ _
.o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=./ `o
..o | Computer Science, Michał “mina86” Nazarewicz (o o)
ooo +----<email/xmpp: mpn@...gle.com>--------------ooO--(_)--Ooo--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists