[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1342024090.14828.45.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 12:28:10 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, yrl.pp-manager.tt@...achi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] ftrace/x86: Add separate function to save regs
On Wed, 2012-07-11 at 12:22 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-07-03 at 17:29 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>
>
> >
> > > + /* Restore flags */
> > > + pushq EFLAGS(%rsp)
> > > + popfq
> > > +
> > > + MCOUNT_RESTORE_FRAME
> >
> > Here, if MCOUNT_RESTORE_FRAME has skip too, I think you don't
> > need to restore flags before restoring other registers, like
> > below;
> >
> > MCOUNT_RESTORE_FRAME 8
> > popfq
> >
> > And also, this will prevent to modify flags before return by
> > addq in MCOUNT_RESTORE_FRAME.
>
> Ah, because the addq will modify flags :-/
>
> Grumble, I guess I should implement this, even though it will make it a
> little more complex. I thought it was better to restore flags
> explicitly, but that's not the case.
>
I know why I did this. Do you want kprobes to be able to modify flags?
If so, then I need to add, before the restore:
movq EFLAGS(%rsp), %rax
movq %rax, SS(%rsp)
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists