[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1342032143.2190.22.camel@iscandar.digidescorp.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 13:42:23 -0500
From: "Steven J. Magnani" <steve@...idescorp.com>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
Cc: viro@...IV.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
michael.brantley@...haw.com, hch@...radead.org, miklos@...redi.hu,
pstaubach@...grid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/17] vfs: add the ability to retry on ESTALE to
several syscalls
Jeff -
On Fri, 2012-06-29 at 14:57 -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> This patchset is the third version of the patchset to add ESTALE
> handling to several syscalls. The basic idea is to allow the client to
> gracefully retry the lookup and call when a NFS server returns ESTALE.
I exercised this using 3.5-rc5 against a memory-starved server that
exports a FAT-backed filesystem. Where normally I see lots of ESTALE
errors due to inode eviction, with this patchset I see none. And, the
performance is much better than the only other way I know to eliminate
the errors, which is to mount with 'lookupcache=none'.
It's not an exhaustive test by any means, just a data point for you.
Thanks!
Lightly-tested-by: Steve Magnani <steve@...idescorp.com>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Steven J. Magnani "I claim this network for MARS!
www.digidescorp.com Earthling, return my space modulator!"
#include <standard.disclaimer>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists