[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201207112121.11046.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 21:21:10 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, Sonic Zhang <sonic.zhang@...log.com>,
Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>,
Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>,
Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@...site.dk>,
Guan Xuetao <gxt@...c.pku.edu.cn>,
Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@...il.com>,
Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/7] PM / I2C: Convert platform I2C drivers to PM handling based on struct dev_pm_ops
Hi all,
As per
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=133996733422413&w=4
the following patches convert some platform I2C controller drivers to the PM
handling based on struct dev_pm_ops:
[1/7] i2c-at91: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management
[2/7] i2c-bfin-twi: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management
[3/7] i2c-ocores: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management
[4/7] i2c-pnx: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management
[5/7] i2c-puv3: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management
[6/7] i2c-stu300: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management
[7/7] i2c-tegra: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management
I'd like to include them into my PM pull request for 3.6 if there are no
objections.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists