[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FFCEC62.5090200@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 08:30:50 +0530
From: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
S390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
Carsten Otte <cotte@...ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, chegu vinod <chegu_vinod@...com>,
"Andrew M. Theurer" <habanero@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, X86 <x86@...nel.org>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>, linux390@...ibm.com,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <srivatsa.vaddagiri@...il.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC V2 2/2] kvm PLE handler: Choose better candidate for
directed yield
On 07/11/2012 02:20 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Raghavendra K T<raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
>> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
>> @@ -1595,6 +1595,9 @@ void kvm_vcpu_on_spin(struct kvm_vcpu *me)
>> continue;
>> if (waitqueue_active(&vcpu->wq))
>> continue;
>> + if (!kvm_arch_vcpu_check_and_update_eligible(vcpu)) {
>> + continue;
>> + }
>
> Saw this fly by for a second time and now it annoyed me enough
> to mention it: those curly braces are superfluous and should be
> dropped.
>
Oops! Sorry.will remove {} and resend with Rik's reviewed-by. TBH,
block got simplified after iterations (local), this one leftout. my
mistake.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists