[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120712162325.624ecd07071801c5ce144f35@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 16:23:25 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bharat Bhushan <r65777@...escale.com>,
Michael Neuling <mikey@...ling.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
<linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm-ppc tree with the powerpc
tree
Hi Alex,
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 07:56:46 +0200 Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de> wrote:
>
> On 12.07.2012, at 05:57, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> > Today's linux-next merge of the kvm-ppc tree got a conflict in
> > arch/powerpc/kvm/booke_interrupts.S between commit c75df6f96c59
> > ("powerpc: Fix usage of register macros getting ready for %r0 change")
> > from the powerpc tree and commit fc372c0843b8 ("booke: Added crit/mc
> > exception handler for e500v2") from the kvm-ppc tree.
> >
> > I fixed it up (see below - could do with checking) and can carry the fix
> > as necessary.
>
> Hrm. Ben already warned me that this will happen, so I did a test merge a few days ago. Back then I also had to change 2 other bits that were not conflicting, to get to code to actually compile.
>
> Could you please do an s/VCPU_GPR(r/VCPU_GPR/R/g in arch/powerpc/kvm/booke_interrupts.S? I'd check if you actually need it myself, but the tree doesn't seem to be pushed out yet :).
Thanks for the response. I checked and I think I got them all. The
tree should be available as soon as the kernel.org mirroring gets done.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists