| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1342075232-29267-13-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 07:40:28 +0100
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Linux-Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Mike Christie <michaelc@...wisc.edu>,
Eric B Munson <emunson@...bm.net>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@...akpoint.cc>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Subject: [PATCH 12/16] netvm: Set PF_MEMALLOC as appropriate during SKB processing
In order to make sure pfmemalloc packets receive all memory
needed to proceed, ensure processing of pfmemalloc SKBs happens
under PF_MEMALLOC. This is limited to a subset of protocols that
are expected to be used for writing to swap. Taps are not allowed to
use PF_MEMALLOC as these are expected to communicate with userspace
processes which could be paged out.
[a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl: Ideas taken from various patches]
[jslaby@...e.cz: Lock imbalance fix]
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
---
include/net/sock.h | 5 +++++
net/core/dev.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
net/core/sock.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
index 680379f..84499b7 100644
--- a/include/net/sock.h
+++ b/include/net/sock.h
@@ -754,8 +754,13 @@ static inline __must_check int sk_add_backlog(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *s
return 0;
}
+extern int __sk_backlog_rcv(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb);
+
static inline int sk_backlog_rcv(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
+ if (sk_memalloc_socks() && skb_pfmemalloc(skb))
+ return __sk_backlog_rcv(sk, skb);
+
return sk->sk_backlog_rcv(sk, skb);
}
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index e065f71..0992daa 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -3154,6 +3154,23 @@ void netdev_rx_handler_unregister(struct net_device *dev)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(netdev_rx_handler_unregister);
+/*
+ * Limit the use of PFMEMALLOC reserves to those protocols that implement
+ * the special handling of PFMEMALLOC skbs.
+ */
+static bool skb_pfmemalloc_protocol(struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ switch (skb->protocol) {
+ case __constant_htons(ETH_P_ARP):
+ case __constant_htons(ETH_P_IP):
+ case __constant_htons(ETH_P_IPV6):
+ case __constant_htons(ETH_P_8021Q):
+ return true;
+ default:
+ return false;
+ }
+}
+
static int __netif_receive_skb(struct sk_buff *skb)
{
struct packet_type *ptype, *pt_prev;
@@ -3163,14 +3180,27 @@ static int __netif_receive_skb(struct sk_buff *skb)
bool deliver_exact = false;
int ret = NET_RX_DROP;
__be16 type;
+ unsigned long pflags = current->flags;
net_timestamp_check(!netdev_tstamp_prequeue, skb);
trace_netif_receive_skb(skb);
+ /*
+ * PFMEMALLOC skbs are special, they should
+ * - be delivered to SOCK_MEMALLOC sockets only
+ * - stay away from userspace
+ * - have bounded memory usage
+ *
+ * Use PF_MEMALLOC as this saves us from propagating the allocation
+ * context down to all allocation sites.
+ */
+ if (sk_memalloc_socks() && skb_pfmemalloc(skb))
+ current->flags |= PF_MEMALLOC;
+
/* if we've gotten here through NAPI, check netpoll */
if (netpoll_receive_skb(skb))
- return NET_RX_DROP;
+ goto out;
if (!skb->skb_iif)
skb->skb_iif = skb->dev->ifindex;
@@ -3191,7 +3221,7 @@ another_round:
if (skb->protocol == cpu_to_be16(ETH_P_8021Q)) {
skb = vlan_untag(skb);
if (unlikely(!skb))
- goto out;
+ goto unlock;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT
@@ -3201,6 +3231,9 @@ another_round:
}
#endif
+ if (sk_memalloc_socks() && skb_pfmemalloc(skb))
+ goto skip_taps;
+
list_for_each_entry_rcu(ptype, &ptype_all, list) {
if (!ptype->dev || ptype->dev == skb->dev) {
if (pt_prev)
@@ -3209,13 +3242,18 @@ another_round:
}
}
+skip_taps:
#ifdef CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT
skb = handle_ing(skb, &pt_prev, &ret, orig_dev);
if (!skb)
- goto out;
+ goto unlock;
ncls:
#endif
+ if (sk_memalloc_socks() && skb_pfmemalloc(skb)
+ && !skb_pfmemalloc_protocol(skb))
+ goto drop;
+
rx_handler = rcu_dereference(skb->dev->rx_handler);
if (vlan_tx_tag_present(skb)) {
if (pt_prev) {
@@ -3225,7 +3263,7 @@ ncls:
if (vlan_do_receive(&skb, !rx_handler))
goto another_round;
else if (unlikely(!skb))
- goto out;
+ goto unlock;
}
if (rx_handler) {
@@ -3235,7 +3273,7 @@ ncls:
}
switch (rx_handler(&skb)) {
case RX_HANDLER_CONSUMED:
- goto out;
+ goto unlock;
case RX_HANDLER_ANOTHER:
goto another_round;
case RX_HANDLER_EXACT:
@@ -3265,6 +3303,7 @@ ncls:
if (pt_prev) {
ret = pt_prev->func(skb, skb->dev, pt_prev, orig_dev);
} else {
+drop:
atomic_long_inc(&skb->dev->rx_dropped);
kfree_skb(skb);
/* Jamal, now you will not able to escape explaining
@@ -3273,8 +3312,10 @@ ncls:
ret = NET_RX_DROP;
}
-out:
+unlock:
rcu_read_unlock();
+out:
+ tsk_restore_flags(current, pflags, PF_MEMALLOC);
return ret;
}
diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
index 4e042b2..757c201 100644
--- a/net/core/sock.c
+++ b/net/core/sock.c
@@ -298,6 +298,22 @@ void sk_clear_memalloc(struct sock *sk)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sk_clear_memalloc);
+int __sk_backlog_rcv(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ int ret;
+ unsigned long pflags = current->flags;
+
+ /* these should have been dropped before queueing */
+ BUG_ON(!sock_flag(sk, SOCK_MEMALLOC));
+
+ current->flags |= PF_MEMALLOC;
+ ret = sk->sk_backlog_rcv(sk, skb);
+ tsk_restore_flags(current, pflags, PF_MEMALLOC);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__sk_backlog_rcv);
+
#if defined(CONFIG_CGROUPS)
#if !defined(CONFIG_NET_CLS_CGROUP)
int net_cls_subsys_id = -1;
--
1.7.9.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists